Trusts are an equitable tool that can allow the courts to come to a fair outcome despite the black letter of the law.
There are two types of trust: express and implied. Express trusts require you intend to create a trust, so you would know. Implied trusts are imposed by the court, and often you would not know that it existed until someone talked to a lawyer and brought a claim.
A trustee is the person who holds the legal title for the benefit of someone else. They have responsibilities and obligations.
A beneficiary is the person who benefits from the trust. They do not have legal title, but they are supposed to enjoy the benefit of the trust.
The law presumes a bargain. If one person gives another person property without getting anything in return a resulting trust may form. What that means is the first person can request the property back. The question is, what did the first person intend when they gave the property to the second person? If they intended the transfer to be a gift then it is a gift. If they did not intend the transfer to be a gift then the asset may be subject to a resulting trust.
That is the hard part. The question is, what evidence is there of the transferor’s intention?
If a person transferred property without receiving anything in return there is a presumption of resulting trust. What that means is that it is up to the recipient to prove the transfer was a gift. If they fail to prove it was a gift then the court will recognize the resulting trust.
A Constructive trust is a trust that can be imposed by a court when a party has been wrongfully denied its rights. Often a constructive trust arises to cure unjust enrichment. For example,
An express trust is formed when you intended to create a trust. For these trusts to form there must be certainty of intention, subject matter, and object. It is best described with an example: